Open-ocean endurance
Range, weather routing, redundancy, medical capability and a Master empowered to cancel any operation that is unsafe.
The objective is to make the improbable boringly competent: inspect, engineer, transport, sail, lower, document, and avoid awakening anything with non-Euclidean opinions.
The final embarkation port will be determined by vessel availability, permits, freight and weather. Southern Chile is a plausible operational base. Great-circle distance from Punta Arenas to Point Nemo is roughly 1,950 nautical miles; Ushuaia is roughly 2,020 nautical miles. Actual sailed distance would be greater because ships do not generally navigate by drawing a ruler across the Pacific.
At 10-12 knots, each passage is approximately seven to eight days before weather and routing margins. A practical charter therefore needs roughly 18-22 days, including embarkation, outward passage, deployment window, contingency and return.
The vessel must be chosen for ocean endurance and deck operations, not for the number of restaurants. Requirements are expected to include competent South Pacific range, adequate reserve fuel, certified lifting or A-frame capability, working deck space, secure sculpture transport, satellite communications, medical capability and an operator willing to support a bespoke deployment.
The final lift plan must be engineered around the actual vessel. Designing the sculpture first and hoping a convenient crane appears later is how one ends up explaining oneself to insurers.
Range, weather routing, redundancy, medical capability and a Master empowered to cancel any operation that is unsafe.
Certified lifting points, load path, restraint, crane/A-frame or winch system, tag lines and a documented deployment procedure.
Satellite communications for weather, safety and project updates, with bandwidth expectations kept on speaking terms with reality.
Confirm that the intended object, location and method can be lawful and environmentally defensible. If permanent placement is not acceptable, redesign the project before fabrication locks us into the wrong answer.
Final sculptural design, mass estimate, lifting points, centre-of-gravity analysis, material specification, corrosion considerations and deployment concept.
Obtain quotations and technical responses from expedition, research and workboat operators capable of the range and lift.
Pattern-making, casting, reinforcement, finishing, inspection and certification of the lifting arrangements.
Move the monument and deployment hardware to the selected port, clear formalities and load using an agreed lift plan.
Passage to the target region, local verification, ceremonial apology, controlled deployment or authorised alternative, and documentation.
Return to port, reconcile accounts, publish the expedition record, imagery and lessons learned, and determine any follow-up observation programme.
The working plan allows for no more than six civilian expedition places, priced provisionally at £30,000 per person. The number may be reduced by the vessel configuration, operator requirements or project personnel needs.
The price is intentionally above entry-level specialist expedition cruising. Comparable 18-20 day Antarctic expeditions are publicly priced from roughly £17,000-£22,000 at lower cabin categories, while 23-day voyages can approach or exceed £30,000. This project is far smaller, bespoke and operationally constrained, so a premium is reasonable.
The project will not deploy anything unless we are satisfied that doing so is lawful and environmentally defensible. The London Convention/Protocol framework and applicable national law require specialist advice before any permanent placement at sea is promised.
If the answer to permanent emplacement is no, the expedition concept must adapt: for example, a recoverable deployment, temporary lowering, documentary/scientific operation or other authorised alternative. The punchline does not outrank the ocean.
The premise is comic. The undertaking is intended to be real. Sculpture, engineering, contracts, vessel operations, regulatory work, passenger safety and accounts would be treated as an ordinary professional project.
NOAA identifies Point Nemo as the oceanic location farthest from land, at 48°52.6′S 123°23.6′W, about 2,688 km from the nearest land. That makes it an unusually appropriate location for an artwork about remoteness, scale and cosmic indifference.
No. The project's working hypothesis says the opposite. The "Probably..." is the joke, not an evidential claim.
The working model is 18-22 days. A southern-Chile route is roughly 2,000 nautical miles each way to Point Nemo before practical routing allowances, so the passages alone can occupy two weeks or more.
Provisionally, yes: up to six civilian places at £30,000 each, but only through a separate contract after a ship, itinerary and operator have been secured. Travel to the embarkation port and personal insurance would normally be additional.
No. GoFundMe is donation-based and currently prohibits ordinary rewards or sales of goods and services in exchange for donations. A berth must be a separate transaction with separate terms.
That is the intention for principal supporters, but the form depends on engineering and environmental advice. Options include a donor band, plaque, returned expedition ledger or sealed archival register. Nothing should be promised that would compromise the deployment.
A permanent live feed from abyssal depth is technically ambitious and would require power, communications and long-term servicing. The credible first objective is a recoverable deep-ocean camera/telemetry system or a documented descent. Continuous live operation is an aspiration, not a promise.
Possibly, but only if weather, water temperature, sea state, recovery arrangements, vessel operations and the Master's judgement permit. It is not included as a guaranteed activity.
The project is staged. Early funds can support feasibility, design, legal work and quotations. Major irreversible commitments should not be made until the funding and permissions justify them.
The project will not dump an object at sea merely because the webpage looked enthusiastic. An authorised recoverable or temporary alternative would be developed, or the deployment element would be cancelled.
That would constitute potentially significant evidence against H0, the null hypothesis - our default assumption that Cthulhu does not exist and nothing supernatural will happen. Peer review may be delayed.